Liverpool Fourth Grace
The collapse of
the Fourth Grace scheme at Liverpool's pier head waterfront site has more than
anything thrown the spotlight on the enormous reality gap in delivering contemporary
architecture in Liverpool and the price we are now paying for the Victorian
City theme park that is WHS.
This page will be a growing section on the latest chapters on the 'Cloud' fiasco
as the council enquiry attempts to unravel the reasons why the scheme unravelled!
Back to Square
One. Before the Cloud was even a twinkle in anybody's eye, the major issues
of providing a cultural complex at Mann Island was being hotly debated. All
the problems and potential difficulties were sidelined the minute it was decided
instead to run a competition for a 'jaw-dropping' complex that could justify
building on this site. To do this you have to build BIG! To build big your need
a commercially viable funding package. This needs a major office and/or residential
component - you can't build out so you need to build up, but you then fall foul
of WHS and you go back to Square One!
It just so happens it was the Cloud that had to be dropped, but any scheme (or replacement scheme) would run into the same brick wall of WHS and 'in keeping'. This scenario is even more apposite when you do try comply with WHS 'in keeping' and 'harmony'. To even begin to provide the volume of public space in Alsop's scheme would then entail so much more public funding and additional private funding... As for ‘going back to square one? The point is you can only do jaw-dropping on this site…so, maybe best is… no building at all? What price 'heritage'?
:LIVERPOOL
FOURTH GRACE - latest comment:
4th Grace Inquiry
You can
follow a transcript of the 4th Grace scrutiny panel online at the LC website.
Makes for interesting
reading.
What a site!
For those of you who thought that Alsop's Cloud was good, then here
is some
news of a possible site in Birkenhead that may brighten your day and improve
downtowners'
view!
Knives Come Out
Poor old Will Alsop. Not content with throwing his scheme out for
the fourth grace, it is now reported that Alsop is being blamed for the number
of revisions made to the scheme in the preceeding six months.
Could this have anything to do with his being instructed to do them in
the first place! [height of towers 'too tall', access ramp from James
St 'no bridges over Strand', façade treatment, etc etc etc...]
Size
Matters
As David Henshaw, CEO of the City Council gives evidence to the inquiry
into the collapse of the Fourth Grace, DL asks why did we let height
restrictions kill this project? Are we to be Milton Keynes or Manhattan?
Liverpool Vision
Exonerated
Steve Parry of Neptune developments, part of the Fourth Grace consortium
appears to have exonerated Liverpool Vision in the collapse of the Fourth Grace
scheme, calling them 'positive and professional' in his meeting with the city
council enquiry.
DL support this view; let's not permit Vision to be made patsy over a decision
made through faltering nerve at the highest echelons of the city..
Euphemistically Speaking
Meanwhile, NWDA Chief Executive Steve Broomhead offers an astounding spin to
the saga in claims this week that the decision to axe the scheme "has absolutely
not damaged Liverpool" and would even boost investor confidence. Ask Alsop.
© 2004, Downtown Liverpool All rights reserved.